First floor to the left / 1.h.v.

First floor to the left / 1.h.v.

First floor to the left / 1.h.v.

At Langahlið 19 in east Reykjavík is the home gallery of Guðrún Hrönn Ragnarsdóttir, named after its placement in the building, 1.h.v. (Fyrsta hæð til vinstri), or first floor to the left. The first exhibition was in 2012. Guðrún lives in Finland and in Reykjavík during the summers, where she holds exhibitions in her flat. Before moving to Finland, Gúðrun was involved in The Living Art Museum (Nýlistasafnið) and participated in curatorial projects. 2016 is the fifth summer and the sixth exhibition at the flat. I visited 1.h.v. to have a guided tour and interviewed Guðrún about the space.

The first exhibition in 2012, of works by Sólveig Aðalsteinsdóttir, began as a bookwork project. In fact, the plan was to publish bookworks along with every exhibition. Bookwork by Sólveig from this exhibition consists of layers of six pages of tracing paper; the artist has drawn on the top page so the rest of the pages show softer and softer markings. The drawings represent the space of the apartment, which consists of six rooms. Sólveig created a drawing, a large outline of the architecural layout of the apartment, and an edition of ten sets of six handmade books. From a text accompanying the exhibition: “The subject of both the drawing and the book is the architectural layout of the apartment; explored through line, form, layout and the duplication. In the production of the book ordinary printing techniques are avoided as simple handmade methods are preferred.”

dsc02695

solveig1

Guðrún chooses artists who she thinks can make a dialogue with the space and between the two artists who are invited to exhibit together in the flat. The first exhibition was with Sólveig, but then the project just kept evolving. She prefers the project to stay open-ended. The second exhibition was held in 2012 by Ingólfur Arnarsson, and Ingólfur’s work above the windows in each room has remained in the flat. It is a color palette on the ceiling reflecting the hues of the colors outside the windows. Ceiling Painting in front of a window in four rooms. Household paint on white ceiling. The chosen colors meet the visitor inside the apartment based on colors outside the window.

ingolfur2

ingolfur1

The exhibition held during the summer of 2013 was of work by Carl Boutard and Eggert Pétursson, artists who had never previously worked together. Carl, from Sweden, started with an illuminated vitrine containing objects in pairs. Eggert showed small floral paintings and photos showing the inside of the paintings. Later they decided that everything in the apartment should exist as a pair: two tables, two chairs, two dressers, two flowers, two vases etc. The bookwork was a reworking of Eggert’s book from 1980, „what I had in mind“. The new version was called „what we had in mind“. Eggert explains the bookproject:

Early in the year 1980 I sat at the desk of my studio of the Jan van Eyck Academy in Maastricht, Holland, with a pile of paper. I closed my eyes and waited for images to appear in my mind. The moment something appeared I quickly sketched an image and soon a substantial pile of drawings had accumulated: pictures of houses, landscape and so on. Faces were excluded. In the following weeks I cycled around Maastricht and the surrounding area with a camera in hand. Whenever I noticed something in the environment that resonated with my drawings I took a picture. This resulted in nine drawings and nine photographs, which were later printed in a small booklet called “what I had in mind.” Two years ago Guðrún Hrönn Ragnarsdóttir showed Carl Boutard the book. When she invited Carl and myself to exhibit at her home gallery, 1 h.v., Carl came up with the idea to repeat this process which I agreed on. Early this year I sat down with a pile of paper in my apartment in Stavanger, Norway, and drew sketches in the same manner as I had done thirty-three years ago. I sent the pile to Carl, who immediately started to search for subject to photograph inspired by my drawings. What I had in mind became what we had communally in mind. Countless participants can now repeat the piece in multiple different ways.

carl

eggert1

Having a gallery in your home could bring many variable outcomes, however, it seems that the conceptual art exhibited here is often unobtrusive and minimal. “The quality of being in a home,” Guðrún says, “is that it automatically ties things into the everyday. I think also when you exhibit in a home you see new possibilities because it’s very different than a gallery space. It changes very much how the visitor approaches the gallery. They start to talk more perhaps. I think the artists definitely take into account that they are exhibiting in a home. I hope the two artists exhibiting can create some kind of dialogue, but it comes about naturally based on who exhibits together.”

The following summer of 2014 Magnus Pálsson exhibited drawings from different times. They were ideas and sketches for works.

mp

Kristinn Guðbrandur Harðarson did an installation around Mount Vörðufell. Excerpt from a text about his contribution:

Kristinn’s works in the exhibition form a type of portrait of Vörðufell in Biskupstungur. Kristinn has had a number of close connections to the mountain and its surroundings for years. The artworks are diverse in style and form. A travel-story in the form of a book narrates the story of climbing the mountain last autumn. A second book is a reflection on the artist’s closeness to the mountain and knowledge about it gathered throughout the years. Simultaneously the book contains biographical fragments, although those are set within a frame limited by time and location.

unnamed

img_0536

Another work consists of text attached to a doorframe. The text presents fragments from walks on and around the mountain over the past decades. There are also two photo collages, firstly focusing on Úlfsgil gully on the southern slopes of the mountain and secondly focusing on the nearby area of Birnustaðir farm. Finally a mural poses as a kind of title page for all the works in the exhibition. During the past few years Kristinn has created works based on his excursions and research of his local area. The works in this exhibition as well as many of his previous works are inspired by oral history, travel stories and the exploration of Icelandic nature by landscape painters such as Kjarval, Ásgrímur and others of their generation.

The summer of 2015 was more of a private exhibition showing many artists: Guðrún Hrönn Ragnarsdóttir, Ragnar Jónasson, Sólveig Einarsdóttir, and Guðrún’s brother Jónas Ragnarsson. The exhibition included mainly drawings and photos created by Jónas when he was a young man. Jónas’ son Ragnar made an installation of his father’s drawings of boats sailing at sea, which were hung on one wall and on the opposite wall Jónas’ sea landscape slides were projected. The other exhibiting artists, Guðrún Hrönn Ragnarsdóttir and Sólveig Einarsdóttir, also referred to Jónas’ work in their own work.

img_1975

img_1984

Now on view at 1 h.v. are works by Inga Þorey Jóhannesdóttir and Ivar Valgerðsson. Inga Þorey presents Fram og til baka, a walk through passports representing the borders between Syria and Iceland. A very organic texture, like tattooed skin, is photographed and set on clouded glass. Each passport has its own aesthetic of pattern and emulsion where the enlarged punchholes create a tunnel linking them together. Each page in every passport has the passports number punched or laser burned. (these holes can be seen on the bottom of each page in every single passport). The ten countries include Syria, Turkey, Greece, Macedonia, Serbia, Hungary, Austria, Germany, Finland, and Iceland.

Ivar’s work Between the Paintings: ten pictures from the National Gallery of Iceland is an installation placement of what appears as paint sample cards on the walls. These are photographs taken of the empty white walls in between the paintings in an exhibition held at the National Gallery of Iceland. They display the camera’s diverse interpretation of color nuances, light, and surface in the museum halls based on their placement. Ivar created a bookwork in connection with the installation.

books

Iceland has a history of innovative exhibition spaces. There was Gallery GÚLP! in the mid-90´s which held exhibitions in a shoebox-sized box. There is Gallery Gangur (The Corridor), another small home exhibition space. There is also Gallery Gestur in a small briefcase, which creates the atmosphere of an exhibition opening in whatever space it is opened. There is also a gallery in a rusty shed, The Shed, which migrates around different inconspicuous locations around Reykjavík.

Guðrún has created an innovative space for conceptual and minimal art that is not separate from where she spends her daily life. The production of bookwork from each exhibition adds to the architectural study of the space, as some aspect of the 3-dimensional transforms into 2-dimensions.

Erin Honeycutt

Photography and Geologic Time – an inquiry into the perception of time

Photography and Geologic Time – an inquiry into the perception of time

Photography and Geologic Time – an inquiry into the perception of time

Normally, we think of rocks as dead material, but on a microscopic level they are in constant growth, animated by invisible chemical processes. The formation of lava rocks is namely an active process from the outset that continues to develop throughout their life cycle. The project revolves around how one can expand the perception of time by looking at the internal structures and processes of lava rocks.  (Veronika Geiger)

image_1smallDetail of Hraun (2016)

Geology and photography are seemingly two fields of thought and action running in parallel streams that rarely intersect with the other except when photographs are taken to rely scientific information about geologic structures. However, both have the ability to relay contemplative inquiry into the perception of time through simple data. Both photography and geology hold a return to origins, a seeking out of the bedrock from which we can know what we know. They both relay a simple equation of cause and effect, whether in the darkroom or through larger processes like the shifting of tectonic plates. Veronika Geiger’s approach to these two fields is inspired by Land Art practices and in this way photography becomes an extension of Land Art. With a background in Fine Art photography from Glasgow School of Art and a recent MFA from Iceland Academy of the Arts, Veronika delves into her experiments with the compulsion of a hypothesis being tested. Methodologically she follows her curiosity with the balance of imagination and chemical fact, reality and speculation.

Hraun (2016) No. 6281 and 6285, Gelatin silver print, 100 x 150 cm, Rock type: Gabbro xenoliths from silicic tuff, Place: Kambsfjall, Króksfjördur, Vestfirdir, Iceland, Age: 10 million years old, Petrographic slides borrowed from the Icelandic Institute of Natural History

For five days at the beginning of August 2016, Veronika and I followed a group of geologists with a variety of research focuses in the Askja area and especially in the new lavafield, Holuhraun. Holuhraun lies just north of Vatnajökull in the Highlands. On August 29, 2014, a volcanic eruption began that produced lava spreading over 85 square km by the time the eruption ended on February 27, 2015. The original surface of Holuhraun was an older lava flow from 1797 (Icelandic Meteorological Office.)

Holuhraun lava field

With the expertise of Morten Riishus, a danish senior researcher in volcanology and geology at the Institute of Earth Science, University of Iceland, we got the priviledge to get insights into geological research methods in the field. Three overlapping research projects took place; the first was looking at the geomorphological and geochemical processes of change in relation to how volcanic glass, dust, and sand from Vatnajökull is transported towards the Northeast across the dunes in the desert landscape north of the glacier; another project looked at the microbiology and colonization of barren land at Holuhraun, i.e. the first signs of life on new lava; the third project aimed to create an analog of the Mars Curiousity Rover’s gigapanning scheme, a camera that creates a matrix of images with the ability to be zoomed in up to 800 times. We were grateful to be allowed this chance to follow the geologists’ work in the field, asking them questions and documenting their process.

Geologist Morten Riishuus and microbiologist Anu Hynninen at work

One day we rode with the geologists through a valley that is flooded daily with glacial runoff. These glacial rivulets arrive in tiny trickles from a great distance. With light sensitive paper placed gingerly in the path of the rivulets, Veronika captured an aspect of their movement and aesthetic that a normal photograph couldn’t capture. Her ‘photograph’ of the glacial flood rivulets were from the actual body of the rivulets, their weight and flow appearing on the paper in different shades. The paper has received its color and patterning directly from the water, with immediate impressions of the light and weather-conditions present on the day they were made.

Geologic tool

Another day we trekked with sheets of handmade paper to Viti, a crater filled with warm cloudy blue water situated next to the larger crater lake, Öskjuvatn. The plain of black sand that we crossed before arriving at the crater gave us a good sense of the surrounding landscape and its vastness. Taking the papers one at a time, some more porous and thick than others, they were let into the silty, mud bottom of Viti’s edges where they gathered directly onto the paper an impression of how sediments are transported. In an expansion of the photographic moment, an impression was taken that included movement, weight, and porosity.

Víti Crater

Later that day we followed the geologists to an area where natural springs created a flowing creek among new lava and old lava. Here, algae that had grown in the spring was placed onto the light sensitive paper and set directly in the sun. Again, the weight and body of the algae created an impression on the paper. In places where the algae blocked the sunlight, the paper remained a distinct shade from the parts marked by sunlight. Any chemical variations resulting from reactions between the water, the algae, and the paper will be seen later in the laboratory.

Hiking on a trail marked through the edge of Holohraun, the two year old lava was distinctly loud under our boots, the brittle whisps of once fluid mass strung across larger bodies of lavarock. In some areas, deposits of sulphur, white and yellow, formed along the mouths of cavernous openings. Attempts were made to take impressions on these deposits, as well as on the sun-heated surfaces. Taking samples of these, as well as of the fine lunar-like sand, Veronika hopes to find a chemical means of fixing them to the image.

Later in Reykjavík, we recorded an open conversation between Morten, Veronika, and I, each representing the approaches of geology, photography, and art history/theory. The intention was to learn more about each of our research interests, the craft of each of our fields, and how they overlapped. It offered me the opportunity to reflect on the idea of the geologic time period of the Anthropocene as an aesthetic event. The Anthropocene opens up an epochal way of thinking about time as well as narrative. The narrative involved in threading the events of an epoch shows how we create meaning in the space between the encounter of different temporalities. This is the encounter that is crucial in Geiger’s project. An example of an encounter in geologic time-scales is presented by Morten Riishuus in the following excerpt from the interview:

As you’re driving from Akureyri east, you’re driving through a volcanic succession that is tilted, layered and packaged toward the Southeast…. If you think about it, you’re driving east and the landscape you’re driving through, this tilted strata towards the East, means you’re driving forward in time as all the layers disappear into the earth. (Morten Riishuus)

Lava from Holuhraun eruption

The media theorist, Jussi Parikka writes about the term deep time which was first used by Siefried Zielinski in the discussion of aspects of media. Parikka’s new materialism of media emphasies a different notion of temporality and spatiality by pointing out how media technology is tightly linked with natural materials. Expanding the temporal use of the term deep time, Parikka uses it to combine the geological materials enabling media processes, and the temporality of the earth, which consists of billions of years of build-up and break-down.

In this way, Veronika’s experiments with photography continue the narrative of material processes of the earth out-of-ground, cultivating the temporality of the earth in a new medium that includes the human senses. In her project at Holuhraun she continued her focus on how one can expand the perception of time by looking at the internal structures and processes of lava rocks. By observing the physical layers and traces of time in the rock, the tension between the geological time-scale and biological time-scale becomes concrete.

Erin Honeycutt


Here is a link to a transcription of the interview in its entirety: interview-transcription

Tools For Transformation – A guide to collaborative, social and impactful projects

Tools For Transformation – A guide to collaborative, social and impactful projects

Tools For Transformation – A guide to collaborative, social and impactful projects

For the past five years the REITIR team has been running an annual two-week experimental workshop in Siglufjörður. The workshop is about collaboration, site-awareness, cross-disciplinary tools, social engagement and interventions in public space. It’s known as the REITIR workshop, but there is more to it than that.
Two members from the team, Arnar Ómarsson and Ari Marteinsson had a discussion about the project and the publication of the book Tools For Transformation wich is based on the methodes used at the workshop.
 
Arnar Ómarsson: We’ve always looked at the workshop as a sort of a study. We started looking at the nature of collaborations in its broadest sense and gradually narrowed the scope and shaped our approach. To the public, this study takes the shape of a two week intensive workshop, but to us it is running throughout the whole year, and bleeds into everything else we do.
mmynd1
The participants come from all around the world and go through a selection process months prior to the workshop. REITIR receives around one hundred applications each year and accept about 25 participants.
 
The number of participants fluctuates between 20 and 25 actually. It’s super hard to select participants, but we get a lot of data from them. We filter out applicants over several rounds and talk to the final group via video chat to make sure they’re up to the task.
Ari Marteinsson: We have a massive network, because we have been doing projects and working in this field for years. So a lot of the time we approach people we know are perfect for the workshop. Site-awareness is deeply rooted in REITIR: the locality, Siglufjörður, is the physical structure that influences everything made at the workshop.
AM: We want to understand the places we work and how to make our stay there impactful
AÓ: … and we find new ways of doing that every year.
AM: The methods we have developed could be applied in many other contexts. It’s important to frame our ideas of site-specificity correctly, so we don’t limit the creative process. One way of looking at it, is that REITIR is a “factory of methods and concepts” that can be “exported” with the appropriate framing.
bokFor the past months they have immersed themselves and a few other trusted collaborators in a comprehensive and detailed examination of the elements and structure of REITIR. The outcome is a book that is set to be published later this year.
AM The book is called REITIR: Tools for Transformation. It’s a very practical guide for anyone who is interested in cross-disciplinary collaborations, workshop organisation, site-specific projects and public space interventions. It includes a lot of big words – but it all boils down to the simple ideas of “do stuff yourself”, “be your own boss” and “act on your ideas”. This book provides the tools to do that.
AÓ: We’re putting everything we know about project work into this book, and between the seven of us we’ve got decades of experience of creating and organising projects of all sorts around the world. We’re opening up the process and enabling others to utilise our methods in a way that suits them. 
AM: The book is registered as “copy-left” concept, meaning the opposite of “copyright”; please use, copy and share anything from the book!
REITIR: Tools For Transformation will be available for free on the REITIR website for anyone to download, use and share. The book is in standard A4 format to make it easy and cheap to print.
AÓ: We decided to go with this standard format after considering a lot of options. It’s a statement, I guess, and an uncommon format for books – but we want everyone to be able to print it, use it and own it.

Promotional video about REITIR: Tools for transformation:


REITIR is a workshop by Urban Space Expanders (USE), a non-profit organisation based in Aarhus, Denmark and Reykjavík, Iceland. Through USE, REITIR is part of a larger organisation that publishes books, does workshops, talks and events about urban projects.

For further information about REITIR, look at their website listed below and follow the book making process on their facebook page.

Relationship between man and robot explored at SÍM 

Relationship between man and robot explored at SÍM 

Relationship between man and robot explored at SÍM 

Arnar Ómarsson and Sam Rees show their latest experiments in SÍM exhibition space at Hafnarstræti 16. This exhibition brings together two very different approaches to the aesthetics of technology. Arnar works with an animated digital self portrait that has been built into a simple installation of an exactly right sized ladder, mechanically modified plant, computer and a screen. Sam presents a series of 5 plinths, each with an interactive mini-diorama focussed around a single white robot and denoted by 1 of the 7 sins. The controls are crudely attached to the plinths, with wires protruding and instructions scrawled in a child-like / playful manner. Viewers are invited to alter the different sounds and robot´s movement with controls affecting the level of pain or type of nightmare.
 Both artists explore the relationship between man and robot in a parallel but complementary manner. Arnar´s focus revolves around the crossover between the virtual and the real world, creating a kind of ridiculous alien cyborg selfie with a moving plant entrail. Whilst Sam questions ideas of empathy, stripping cuddly toys to their naked plastic interior but adding big tearful eyes and the option to inflict pain, like a futuristic Stanford experiment for kids.
Sam Rees is a British artist based in Húsavík, northeast of Iceland where he manages Fjúk, a small arts centre and residency. He teaches in the design faculty at LHI and has a passion for DIY and maker culture. Arnar Ómarsson is an Icelandic artist and project manager living in Reykjavík. He is currently enrolled in the fine art masters programme at the Iceland Art Academy in Reykjavík. He received his bachelor degree from the University of the Arts’ London in 2011 and has since been based in Denmark and Iceland by most part. Arnar is a project manager and co-founder at REITIR in Siglufjörður and has been involved in developing platforms such as Institut for (x), Verksmiðjan in Hjalteyri and Alþýðuhúsið in Siglufjörður.
The exhibition is up until Monday 26th of September at SÍM exhibition space Hafnarstræti 16 101 Reykjavík. 
Opening hours: 10:00 – 16:00 Monday to Friday.
Look at Us

Look at Us

Look at Us

Vulnerable and endangered animals are Halla Gunnarsdóttir´s subject in her exhibition Look at Us. Halla presents 27 oil paintings, all of which portray vulnerable species. The animals are shown with distinctively human features and placed in often humorous poses, settings and situations that strive to evoke an emphatic link between the subject and the viewer. By anthropomorphizing its subjects the work hopes to show that what separates us from animals is very little and, at the same time, to communicate the gravity of the man-made crisis they face.

In the past few years Halla´s body of work has focused on conservation and vulnerable animals, inspired in part by her travels, for example to Antarctica and Indonesia. In September 2015, Halla traveled to the Arctic with a group of scientists and nature photographers to raise awareness of the effects of climate change on the region.

A central tenet of sustainable thought is the need to protect biodiversity, a concept used to define the diverse nature of our habitat. Biodiversity is fundamental to the survival of species and habitats that together make life on the planet. Today we are witnessing an ever greater erosion of biodiversity, which has far-reaching effects on the world’s natural environment and hence on our well-being.

Human interference in the ecosystem is one of the greatest causes of disruption and change in natural habitats. This includes agricultural systems, construction, the mining of natural resources, as well as the depletion of forests, seas, rivers, lakes and soil. It also results in the invasion of foreign species, pollution and climate changes that today are called global warming.

untitled-1

Halla’s figuratively presented animal subjects engaging in human-like actions provoke an emphatic reaction in the viewer. A close look at the paintings strengthens the sense that the distance between humans and animals is not significant. Her work is thus a powerful reminder of the importance of treating nature and animals with respect. This is true everywhere, even in areas like the Arctic where very little life thrives. The exhibition demonstrates that the artist’s travels and studies in the region have had a profound influence on her work. She succeeds in communicating to the viewer the importance of actively participating in conservation efforts.

The most important element in future conservation debates should be the concept of sustainable development. The logic behind it is that in their constant quest for progress and harnessing of natural resources, humans must not deplete natural reserves to the degree that we leave the next generation with a damaged environment.

Polar bears are among many vulnerable species whose lives are in danger from the changes caused by the melting of the polar caps in their natural habitat and which have eroded their chances of feeding themselves. It seems logical that the Icelandic public should care about the danger that many animal species now face. But Árni Stefán Árnason, a lawyer who focuses on animal rights, believes that widespread ignorance characterizes attitudes towards animal rights and conservation. This lack of respect is demonstrated when polar bears are killed when they drift here with Arctic ice. He has pointed out possible solutions: in Canada, for example, when such an event occurs a team is dispatched in a helicopter to shoot the animal with tranquilizers. The animal is then transported to more distant areas. Árni has pointed out that animals that arrive here can be transported back to Greenland using this method.

There is an ongoing debate on what should be done with polar bears that drift to the country. But regardless of people’s opinions it is important that the government formulate a future policy for action since the odds of polar bears drifting to the country have increased with the warming of the seas. An action plan that safeguards biodiversity and protects endangered animals is needed.

Changing circumstances call for a revision of the values and ideas we build our society and economy on. It is important to build on the ideology of sustainable development in which the economy, social equality and environmental conservation join to ensure acceptable living conditions for all inhabitants of the planet.

Works of art are well suited to raise awareness of sustainability issues. The philosopher Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir discussed the relationship between words and images in her article Long and Short Shadows: The Truman Show. The article is a philosophical meditation on reality and artificial reality. She quotes Herbert Marcuse who believes that men live in ‘a society of organized stupidity […] consumers who are fed by the media and made one-dimensional.’ She points out that Virilo assumes that the image has become more powerful than the written word. The language of images is subtler than the written word because it has easier access to our sensibilities. So long as our eyes are open we are open to visual stimulation, but to read we have put ourselves into a particular state of mind.

The arts are an important part of Education for Sustainability. Such education has to build on a moral foundation that can create a general change in attitudes and lead to a brighter future for all. The arts can affect our emotions, give us inner peace, cause tension, inspire new ideas, provide advice, arouse empathy, make us angry and disturb viewers. The arts can change attitudes. All of the above is true of the work exhibited in Look at Us.

Halla’s exhibition shows that we are here in the hands of a well-educated practitioner of the arts. Halla began her art studies at the Florence Academy of Art and completed an M.F.A  in figurative sculpture from the New York Academy of Art in 2003. On graduating she was awarded the NYAA Sculpture Research Fellowship. She also holds a B.A in Liberal Arts from the New School in New York and an MBA from the Sorbonne in París.

The composition and treatment of colour in the exhibition’s works have a powerful effect, to some degree reminiscent of mid-century art. It is not surprising that her background is in Italy.

Halla is rapidly developing her visual imagery and hopefully she will continue on that path, whether in painting or sculpture.

Ásthildur B. Jónsdóttir
Assistant Professor at the Iceland Academy of the Arts


Artists website: hallagunnarsdottir.com

The Living Art Museum (Nýló) receives donation from Ólafur Lárusson’s studio

The Living Art Museum (Nýló) receives donation from Ólafur Lárusson’s studio

The Living Art Museum (Nýló) receives donation from Ólafur Lárusson’s studio

The Living Art Museum is endowed with a large selection of material from the studio of artist Ólafur Lárusson (1951 – 2014). Family of the late Ólafur Lárusson, have gifted the Living Art Museum a large portion of material, spanning two decades from around 1970 – 1990, gathered from Ólafur´s art studio. Amongst this donation is part of the artist´s personal library, his film collection, negatives, slides, photographs, sketches, VHS recordings performance documentation, exhibition catalogues and invitations, artistic research and experimentation, as well as proposals for works in the form of drawings, snapshots and conceptualizations that had never been fully realized.

The Living Art Museum will move their exhibition space to the newly renovated Marshall House in Grandi, alongside Kling and Bang Gallery and Ólafur Elíasson. The new space in the harbour will open with a retrospective exhibition echoing Ólafur´s practice and contribution as one from the young and radical generation of contemporary artists who surfaced during the seventies. It will include documentation of his performance work and other substantial material that had not been shared with the public eye during his lifetime and pull together works from The National Gallery of Iceland and Reykjavík Art Museum, along with those in private collection from friends, family, and collectors.

skissubok

A photograph from Ólafur´s 1978 Rainbow performance in SÚM Gallery.

oli1Curators Þorgerður Ólafsdóttir, Director of the Living Art Museum and Collection Manager Becky Forsythe have titled the exhibition Rolling Line, the namesake to a photographic work Ólafur completed in 1975. The artist himself is seen somersaulting through nature within Rolling Line, and the work references the possibility of a continuous line always ending in a circle. This reflection is well related to the core of the exhibition, which aims to shed new light on the process and period of the artist, from 1971 when he started as a student in The Icelandic College of Art and Craft, until the early eighties when Ólafur began to turn away from one of his main mediums, the photograph.

Ólafur Lárusson was born in 1951 and raised in Austur-Meðalholtum, South Iceland and in Hlíðar – 105 Reykjavík. He studied at the Icelandic College of Art and Craft, now Iceland Academy of the Arts, from 1971-74 and subsequently in Haarlem, Holland, where he graduated from Atalier ´63 in 1976. Ólafur was an extremely prolific and productive artist during the seventies and played a key role in shaping the priorities of the icelandic art scene at that time. He was amongst the last artists to be accepted into the SÚM Gallery movement, a founding member of the Living Art Museum, and the first indications of the museum were stored in his studio on Mjölnisholt prior to when the board of Nýló received the facilities at Vatnsstígur 3b in 1980.

oli2Rolling Line, 1975

“The gift from Ólafur´s studio, marks a turning point for Nýló and is also an important addition to art history. The archive is the first of its kind to be accepted by the museum, where light is cast upon the life and practice of the artist in such a way. With the family´s donation, video documentation from Ólafur´s Rainbow performance – which was performed in SÚM Gallery in 1978 and had been lost for many years, has now surfaced. The recording shows the artist breaking hanging glass plates that have been painted the colours of the rainbow, with his head – the broken glass swinging back and forth alongside it.

This contribution also strengthens Nýló´s research into collecting, preserving and archiving performance art, and underlines the immeasurable value of the insight provided through otherwise unseen material gathered over time in the artist´s studio; conceptual-work, the process and evolution of artworks, and specific focuses, streams and remains of certain periods.”

Ólafur passed away on December 4th, 2014. On 10th September he would have celebrated his 65th birthday and the museum would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge his contribution to shaping the scene of Icelandic art.

On behalf of the Living Art Museum,
Þorgerður Ólafsdóttir and Becky Forsythe

UA-76827897-1